Current:Home > MarketsRunning out of marijuana, Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket get approval to ship it to the islands -DollarDynamic
Running out of marijuana, Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket get approval to ship it to the islands
View
Date:2025-04-27 21:54:27
MEREDITH, N.H. (AP) — Cannabis regulators in Massachusetts on Thursday issued an administrative order that will allow pot to be transported to Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket islands for the first time.
The order came as Martha’s Vineyard was about to run out of pot, with one dispensary temporarily closing in May and the other saying it would close by September.
One of the dispensaries, Island Time, had filed a lawsuit against the commission. The other dispensary, Fine Fettle, was the sole grower of pot on the island and had provided all the pot for sale. But Fine Fettle said the small grow operation was no longer economically feasible and was closing it down.
Although Massachusetts voters opted to legalize marijuana more than seven years ago, the state commission had previously not allowed transportation of pot to the islands. It had taken the position that transporting pot across the ocean — whether by boat or plane — risked running afoul of federal laws.
There are more than 230 registered medical users and thousands more recreational ones on Martha’s Vineyard.
The tension between conflicting state and federal regulations has played out across the country as states have legalized pot. California law, for example, expressly allows cannabis to be transported to stores on Catalina Island, while Hawaii last year dealt with its own difficulties transporting medical marijuana between islands by amending a law to allow it.
Federal authorities have also been shifting their position. The Justice Department last month moved to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug, though still not a legal one for recreational use.
veryGood! (66579)
Related
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Climate Advocacy Groups Say They’re Ready for Trump 2.0
- Jordan Chiles Reveals She Still Has Bronze Medal in Emotional Update After 2024 Olympics Controversy
- Singles' Day vs. Black Friday: Which Has the Best Deals for Smart Shoppers?
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Chet Holmgren injury update: Oklahoma City Thunder star suffers hip fracture
- Cruise ship rescues 4 from disabled catamaran hundreds of miles off Bermuda, officials say
- 'Heretic' spoilers! Hugh Grant spills on his horror villain's fears and fate
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- 24 more monkeys that escaped from a South Carolina lab are recovered unharmed
Ranking
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- 'Yellowstone's powerful opening: What happened to Kevin Costner's John Dutton?
- Taylor Swift Politely Corrects Security’s Etiquette at Travis Kelce’s Chiefs Game
- Kalen DeBoer, Jalen Milroe save Alabama football season, as LSU's Brian Kelly goes splat
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Utah AD Mark Harlan rips officials following loss to BYU, claims game was 'stolen from us'
- US Open finalist Taylor Fritz talks League of Legends, why he hated tennis and how he copied Sampras
- Taylor Swift touches down in Kansas City as Chiefs take on Denver Broncos
Recommendation
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
Solawave Black Friday Sale: Don't Miss Buy 1, Get 1 Free on Age-Defying Red Light Devices
What to know about Mississippi Valley State football player Ryan Quinney, who died Friday
Week 10 fantasy football rankings: PPR, half-PPR and standard leagues
Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
2025 NFL Draft order: Updated first round picks after Week 10 games
Vikings' Camryn Bynum celebrates game-winning interception with Raygun dance
Wisconsin’s high court to hear oral arguments on whether an 1849 abortion ban remains valid